I have to questions, the first one is much more important
Mark M.
we are short on time, so type quickly! :-)
ndrocchietto_ivano
so I will start with the less important one that is just a curiosity, why existed Asynctask if AsynctaskLoader looks even better according to what i read?
Mark M.
AsyncTask came first
ndrocchietto_ivano
I see
Mark M.
AsyncTaskLoader uses AsyncTask in its implementation, IIRC
ndrocchietto_ivano
the second question is
ndrocchietto_ivano
ok
ndrocchietto_ivano
i read your rxjava2 update
Mark M.
that chapter will be expanded, plus fix a problem with how I handled configuration changes, in the next book update
ndrocchietto_ivano
great, but...to learn really deep the subject should i start with RXjava1 that is much more documented, or is better to start from rxjava2. personally i have some difficulty to manage both
Mark M.
there are enough API changes that I am covering RxJava 2, rather than write a bunch on RxJava 1 and have to re-write it later
Mark M.
I cannot really tell you what is better for you
Feb 1
9:55 AM
ndrocchietto_ivano
\generally speaking?
ndrocchietto_ivano
should one start with RX1 to understand better rx2?
Mark M.
I didn't
ndrocchietto_ivano
cool
ndrocchietto_ivano
I will do the same but I am afraid company want rx1 as well for several reasons