Aug 23 | 9:55 AM |
Mark M. | has entered the room |
Mark M. | turned on guest access |
Mark M. | has entered the room |
Mark M. | has left the room |
Mark M. | has entered the room |
Mark M. | has left the room |
John W. | has entered the room |
Mark M. |
howdy John!
|
Mark M. |
how can I help you today?
|
John W. |
And greetings to you too Sir...
|
Aug 23 | 10:00 AM |
Siik | has entered the room |
Siik |
Hello.
|
Mark M. |
howdy, Siik!
|
Mark M. |
John: do you have a question?
|
Siik |
Hi Mark, how are you doing? You answered my
question today on SO. It was about holding a ViewPager in Fragments. I
got that nested Fragments are currently unsupported and my solution
can't possibly be of help in any any future OS updates. I just want to
make it in a right way, so asking you for advice, how to properly handle
the case when I have two Fragments within Activity and want to use a
ViewPager to swipe between different Fragments in one of them. Or this
is kind of bad idea and I need to rethink UX?
|
Mark M. |
Siik: what you want is fine, just don't put that ViewPager itself in a Fragment
|
John W. |
My first time here, having just downloaded to my
Google Nexus 7, and run a test app. But I notice the 'baked-in app
won't expand the screen with a pinch gesture. Is this known?
|
Mark M. |
John: IIRC, pinch-to-zoom was giving me difficulty -- there's a zoom option in settings in the overflow menu
|
Mark M. |
but I'll try to make a point of experimenting with pinch-to-zoom again in the near future
|
Siik |
Don't know where to put it then because what I
have is just two Fragments, the screen divided by them, the first half
need to by 'swypie`
|
Mark M. |
Siik: oh, sorry, I misread your question
|
Mark M. |
while your desired UX is fine, the implementation of fragments-within-fragments just isn't supported
|
Mark M. |
you're welcome to use them and pray
|
Mark M. |
or, remove fragments from one side of the equation
|
Aug 23 | 10:05 AM |
Mark M. |
either by not using fragments within the ViewPager (just views), or by making the ViewPager be held by the activity directly
|
Mark M. |
bear in mind that you can have left-and-right splits in an activity without using fragments
|
Siik |
If ViewPager would be held the the activity directly I'll have to swipe the whole screen.
|
Mark M. |
so, for example, your activity could have a horizontal LinearLayout with a ViewPager and a fragment
|
Mark M. |
no
|
Mark M. |
the ViewPager is only as big as you make it
|
Mark M. |
if the ViewPager takes up half the screen, you only swipe in that half
|
Mark M. |
that
|
Mark M. |
er, that does not require the ViewPager to be inside a fragment
|
Mark M. |
any more than having a Button take up half the screen requires that the Button be inside a fragmet
|
Mark M. |
er, fragment
|
Siik |
Yeah, this sounds like a plan, I can remake the layout to have a LinearLayout to hold a ViewPager and a Fragment...
|
Mark M. |
right
|
Mark M. |
on a smaller screen, the activity might just hold the ViewPager, for example
|
Siik |
right :)
|
Mark M. |
John: do you have another question?
|
John W. |
Mark: Yes, your 'permanent' zoom preference works,
but is only useful on max. No problem, though, I'm really here to see
what Office Hours is like....I'm using the Kindle version of your book,
which adds the ability to expand the diagrams! I'll say farewell for
now, and will visit again when I have something to say. Thanks!
|
Mark M. |
John: could you clarify a bit about "only useful on max"?
|
Siik |
I'm fine now, thanks for your advice, Mark. Leaving now, I'll join you next time I have something to ask.
|
Mark M. |
Siik: OK
|
Aug 23 | 10:10 AM |
John W. |
OK, when I installed your app & noticed the
lack of pinch, I went to the menu zoom & noticed it was on max. It
could be made less, but this was not useful.
|
Mark M. |
ah
|
Mark M. |
I'll have to run some tests on the 7, then
|
John W. |
OK, seems like a great device. Bye.
|
Aug 23 | 10:15 AM |
Mark M. |
if anyone has any questions, feel free to chime in
|
Aug 23 | 10:20 AM |
Siik | has left the room |
Aug 23 | 10:30 AM |
John W. |
Oh, just before I go, what did you mean by 'IIRC' is it a thing like 'RTFM'?..:-)
|
Mark M. |
IIRC = if I recall correctly
|
John W. |
Thanks, and TTFN...
|
Mark M. |
see ya!
|
John W. | has left the room |
Aug 23 | 10:45 AM |
Mark M. | has entered the room |
Mark M. | has left the room |
Aug 23 | 11:00 AM |
Mark M. | turned off guest access |